Support, I think this draft fill the missing piece for IPFIX to support SR, it will be useful for this draft to cover SRv6 data plane as well.
-Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Joe Clarke (jclarke) 发送时间: 2020年8月13日 20:41 收件人: opsawg <[email protected]> 主题: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type Hello, WG members. During the IETF 108 virtual meeting, we had Thomas present this work. It has been reviewed by SPRING as well as on this list. The SPRING consensus was the work is better suited for opsawg. The adoption hum during the IETF 108 virtual meeting was “Piano” which was middle of the road (though given the hum rules that is somewhat inconclusive). Regardless, the chairs want to hear from the list. This document aims to modernize the IPFIX MPLS label type for segment routing in order to provide more visibility for the MPLS-SR data plane. Does opsawg want to adopt this work? This starts a two-week call for adoption. It will be concluded on August 27, 2020. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
