Support, it is important to decouple network layer from service layer and avoid 
layer violation.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Joe Clarke (jclarke)
发送时间: 2020年8月13日 20:49
收件人: opsawg <[email protected]>
主题: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-bgbw-opsawg-vpn-common

Hello, WG members.  On the IETF 108 virtual meeting, Oscar presented the status 
of the L3NM, L2NM, and the VPN common work.  While this VPN common YANG module 
started as an individual document (per the chairs’ request), the L2NM and L3NM 
modules need to choose a direction for how to handle common typedefs and 
groupings between them.

On the virtual meeting we did a hum which indicated “Pianissimo” support.  
Again, the hum system had some interesting rules, so this is not conclusive, 
but seems to favor that this common module work should exist as its own, 
standalone document that both L2NM and L3NM will consume.  In this manner, one 
would not need to import either L2NM or L3NM to make use of/extend these common 
attributes.

To that end, the chairs would like a call for adoption of 
draft-bgbw-opsawg-vpn-common.  Additionally, comments on the approach and the 
choice of common attributes are welcome, especially from those that were unable 
to attend the IETF 108 virtual meeting.

This serves as a two week call for adoption ending on August 27, 2020.

Thanks.

Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to