> I'd like to provide some feedback on > draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-03 in relation to RDAP. The current > draft makes reference in passing to RDAP, and the remarks: RPSL > attribute will fit into the RFC7483 Section 5.4 IP network object > class, however the proposed geofeed: attribute has no such mapping in > RDAP. > > I would like to suggest that this draft amend RFC7483 to add "geofeed" > as a possible member of the IP network object, with the same format > and to be treated the same as the RPSL attribute.
we intentionally do not attempt to change RPSL or RDAP; though we do suggest how to change RPSL and could do the same for RDAP. we felt it would best be left to those who own those protocols to maintain them. of course we could be wrong in this. let's discuss when we push -04 and it is a wg document. randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
