Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > PCAPNG is a done deal.
Thank you
> We might want to discuss a next generation after that, but I would
> expect that people are still happy after having migrated from PCAP to
> PCAPNG.
One thing that many people *DO* want is to have more easily parsed packet
output.
That is, that the result of parsing an IPv6/UDP/QUIC/{+injected crypto key}/HTML
content is a nice CBOR sequence of CBOR maps of what was inside.
(This is may be more-or-less IPFIX. I don't have the expertise to say for sure)
But, that's a different effort.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
