now that last call is over, it's time to make trouble by requesting to add a hack. ggm, doc shepherd, has this idea about hierarchic signing which would affect this doc by adding
If an inetnum: A points to a geofeed file which is signed per Section 4, then a geofeed file pointed to by inetnum: B which is covered by A (i.e., B is for a more specific prefix of A) the geofeed file pointed to by inetnum: B SHOULD also be signed. If not, then the consumer should be suspicious of data within the geofeed file pointed to by B. to 5. Operational Considerations would anyone care to comment, object, maybe even support? randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
