A 04 version has gone up, with sensible edits to refine references to the functional code (RSC) signing example, and no shepherd process is required for this change: its good, useful and doesn't alter any normative or IDNIT behaviour as I see it.
cheers -George On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 6:01 AM Joe Clarke via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Joe Clarke has requested publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-03 > as Proposed Standard on behalf of the OPSAWG working group. > > Please verify the document's state at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds/ > > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
