I think it would benefit from opsawg review, and that a standard is appropriate in this instance.
Eliot > On 16 Mar 2021, at 21:16, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Signed PGP part > > Tianran Zhou <[email protected]> wrote: >> IMO, whether to apply ISE or WG adoption depends on the authors themselves. >> If I recall right, we did not get the adoption request from the >> authors. > > I actually did post back in 2020 > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/w22FWi_D5586H_LK2UXtzXLhx88/ > > I got very little interest at all. > > The document was then simplified, all the DPP integration was removed, and I > approached the Return Logistics Association (RLA.org) for a code that would > integrate into their system. > > I think that the OPSAWG has very little available bandwidth for MUD related > things, and the mud-qrcode document is not where I would want to spend the > limited bandwidth of OPSAWG, since I think that there is very little for the > WG. But, if the WG wants it, that's fine with me. > > RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) <[email protected]> wrote: >> In my opinion, work that is in scope for an existing working group must >> first be offered to that working group. If the working group has no >> interest in pursuing it, that is OK and it can be brought to the >> Independent Stream provided it does not conflict with ongoing work in the >> working group. > >> Of course, I can form my own opinion on whether there is interest in the >> working group, and I can make my own judgement about conflict, but it is >> helpful if the working group chairs can give advice because they should >> have a better understanding of what the working group thinks. > > Unlike my other two MUD related documents, this document does not make any > changes at all to RFC8520. > > The mud-acceptable-urls document an Update (Amends), for RFC8520, and needs > WG review. > The mud-iot-dns-considerations document is a BCP, and it is getting > cross-area review (and a dnsop presentation last week), and I have a number > of issues to deal with. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
