Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-10: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document, and thank you to the shepherd for a very well-written and in-depth shepherd write up: it was very informative and very appreciated. I have one DISCUSS point (that should be easy to fix) and a question. Francesca 1. ----- then BASE64 encoded and line wrapped to 72 or fewer characters. FP: Please add a (normative) reference to RFC 4648 and specify if Section 4 ("base64") or Section 5 ("base64url") is to be used. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. ----- then BASE64 encoded and line wrapped to 72 or fewer characters. FP: Less of a comment and more of a question: what is the reason for setting the line length, and specifically to 72 (or fewer) characters? _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
