Thanks Thomas. IETF LC requested.
Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: 02 July 2021 05:23 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-05 > > Hi Rob, > > Excellent. Many thanks for the AD review and comments. > > I updated and posted the draft -06 version accordingly. > > Best wishes > Thomas > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 8:17 PM > To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-TCZ-ZH1 <[email protected]>; draft- > [email protected]; > [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-05 > > Hi Thomas, > > This is my AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-05. > > Thanks for the draft, it is both short and sweet, and I have only a few minor > comments/suggestions: > > 1. In the abstract, I would suggest changing on which MPLS control plane > protocol within => the MPLS control plane protocol used within > > 2. Please add a reference to RFC 7012 in the IANA registrations. > > E.g., something like: > > This document requests IANA to allocate the following code points in > the existing subregistry "IPFIX MPLS label type (Value 46)" under the > "IPFIX Information Elements" registry [RFC7012] available at [IANA-IPFIX]. > > 3. Two minor nits: > > Also [I-D.ali-spring-sr-traffic-accounting] => Also, > [I-D.ali-spring-sr-traffic- > accounting] > > I would like to thank to => > I would like to thank > > Please post an updated draft with these changes, then let me know and I'll > kick off the IETF LC. > > Med, thanks for the good shepherd writeup, it is both clear and informative. > > Thanks, > Rob _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
