Hi Martin,

Thank you very much for the review. In revision -11, we will add the reference 
to IOAM DEX and update the status of multipoint-alt-mark to RFC8889. 

Best regards, 
Haoyu

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 9:17 PM
To: The IESG <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email 
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory 
paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fblog%2Fhandling-iesg-ballot-positions%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7Cc254ac7d65e74614e34b08d9ab1bd7fb%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637728958355317130%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=K0fBYi7thTK2o%2FXvdG%2BVI55%2BQ7DcyRLErz%2FmYBROpFw%3D&amp;reserved=0
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-opsawg-ntf%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7Cc254ac7d65e74614e34b08d9ab1bd7fb%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637728958355327035%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=WSuDjdYvJ78yVxv5almpee30tledABx8x1Jw67PrCEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A.3.4 and A.3.5. Note that IOAM has a direct export mode in an adopted draft 
with similar properties to PBT.
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7Cc254ac7d65e74614e34b08d9ab1bd7fb%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637728958355327035%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=kaugJYLTHtOHs0Pbs4bHz0hMSDj7w%2FvaNdke3jhuvqI%3D&amp;reserved=0

The reference to draft-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark is now RFC8889.

Thanks to Michael Scharf for the TSVART review.



_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to