Hi Nicolas:

Thank you for your review.

On 20.12.21 02:16, Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker wrote:
- I realize the point about vulnerabilities info having a different change rate
than software but why not include support to retrieve vulnerabilities from the
endpoint? Part of this question is driven by that I find the document
inconsistent and slightly confusing in the retrieval distinction

The issue here is the nature of the information and who publishes it.  The SBOM itself is intimately bound to what is on the device, and the SBOM cannot change unless the underlying software changes.  So it may make sense in some circumstances for the device to offer the SBOM.

On the other hand, vulnerability information can be sourced by anyone, and may change without the software on the device changing.  That is, “I, Joe Shmo, found a vulnerability in the ACME automated widget peeler”, or ACME could say that without the software on the device having changed.  Also, I really don't know anyone who is going to implement vulnerability information on the device.  If you do, I could be convinced to make a change.


- What is the reason for not having a well known endpoint for the vulnerability
info? I can see that it sometimes is not as clear and useful as the SBOM,
especially with the endpoint retrieval not supported, but wondering if there is
more to it than that?

See above, but also some mechanisms are already defining .well-known ports.  I think CSAF is one such, although I think they need more work.  That effort is happening over in OASIS.


- In the security section is firmware and software used somewhat
interchangeably? Trying to understand if something specific is meant with the
current wording that I'm not seeing. Also I'm not sure the skewing example
makes sense. I would think it would be very common that a mfr updates the SBOM
on it's server and hence you would often get this mismatch unless you query the
device in question before applying anything to it


Yes, this was confusing.  I've removed the word firmware.  It's not that this stuff COULDN'T be firmware.  Firmware is just burnt software.

Eliot

Thanks again for your review.

Eliot

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to