Hi Adrian, Sorry, this had got stuck, I had wanted to check Roman's and Ben's abstain comments. Anyway, I think that the document is in reasonable shape, and I've now pushed the button for this to proceed.
I would like to thank the authors and WG for their work on this document. Regards, Rob -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> Sent: 18 February 2022 14:46 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwil...@cisco.com> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf....@ietf.org Subject: Status of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf Hi, I'm just reviewing a different draft in OPSAWG (draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework) and it has a reference to draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf It seems to be in a bit of an odd state. It went into IESG evaluation at the end of October and attracted some weighty comments (one set attached to an Abstain ballot, one set to a Discuss that has now been cleared). Nevertheless, the document shows it has enough Yes ballots to be approved, and no Discusses. It is in "Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup" state. Since the start of the IESG review, the document has been updated (three times with the last revision being on December 3rd) and emails seem to have gone around explaining the updates. I see nothing on the OPSAWG mailing list to suggest that you have any further issues with the document, so I wonder why it is "stuck" and if the reference I am reviewing is good. Any clues? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
