Hi Joe and OPSAWG chairs: I did not request any time on my two MUD drafts, or on the PCAP(NG) documents.
It appears that OPSAWG has a full schedule anyway, and is conflicted with SHMOO and CFRG and ADD for me. On the topic of PCAP, Carsten has requested that an additional document be created that would just establish the required IANA Registries, and then both PCAP and PCAPng would be published as Informational. Perhaps Historical and Informational. There is some overlap with IPFIX as well that has been discussed on and off for some time. On the topic of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-04, the document is very much ready. I have been hoping that someone will push the review request button, and assign a document shepherd. On the topic of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations, the document has received a number of reviews, including detailed discussion in DNSOP. I've been asked to expand _Strategies to map names_ at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03.html#section-3-3 with more details, and I would definitely like some help here. The best help would be in form of a reference to some other document that explains things already. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
