Hi, Trimming...
<mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: [...] > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> De la part de Martin Björklund > > via > > Datatracker > > Envoyé : mardi 8 mars 2022 09:43 > > À : yang-doct...@ietf.org > > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-sap....@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > > Objet : [OPSAWG] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-02 > > > > Reviewer: Martin Björklund [...] > > o "interface-type" > > > > It is not clear to me how this relates to the > > "/interfaces/interface/type" from RFC 8343. How are the interface > > types defined in iana-if-type mapped to the types defined in this > > document? Perhaps they are not? > > > > > > [Med] We have considered in the past the use of 8343/7224, but we went > finally with the current approach as we want to cover a limited set of > things such as bridge domains, bearer references, IRBs, etc. that we > are already using in other service modules. The mapping to the > detailed interface types as per 7224 will be made by an orchestrator > when it translates this network module into devices modules. Ok. Perhaps you can add a few lines of text that explains this in the document. /martin _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
