TLSTM was the name given to it by RFC 6353 and does provide the full context (i.e. a transport model), so I am hesitant to change that part, but I don't see any problem with calling it SNMP-TLSTM registry. I will make that change in the next version.
Regards, Ken Vaughn Trevilon LLC 6606 FM 1488 RD #148-503 Magnolia, TX 77354 +1-936-647-1910 +1-571-331-5670 cell [email protected] www.trevilon.com > On Apr 7, 2022, at 8:51 AM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the heads-up. > > I think TLSTM is confusing, could it perhaps be SNMPTLS or something similar? > I understand “prior art.” At a minimum, the new IANA registry needs to be > renamed.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
