From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
<[email protected]>
Sent: 17 May 2022 16:48

I am closing the WG LC for this document.  The LC prompted some good
comments from DIR reviews and a comprehensive review from Adrian which
led to a TEAS cross-review.

The biggest discussion came between Tom P and the WG/authors on the
definition of what a SAP is in the vein of this doc.   While some of his
suggestions have made it into the latest revision of the document, I am
not certain this discussion has been fully resolved.

The last email I saw was
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/D-z_rGqFl8V47fHlAkwSqiOxEDk/.
Is this resolved?

<tp>
well, look at Mach Chen's Rtgdir review which. for me, covers the same ground 
and suggests that it is unresolved.  I am perhaps more familiar than Mach with 
the terminology of the various TEAS documents and so am not quite so puzzled as 
he is but would say we both share the same puzzlement.

I was looking at another I-D by the author, draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm, and was 
struck by the use of the term 'service' in that I-D which I again was unclear 
about the meaning of, but in that I-D. it is not such a barrier to my 
understanding.

Tom Petch

Based on that, we can take -05 forward to the IESG once we get a
shepherd.  But this point seems important to resolve.

Joe

On 4/22/22 15:07, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
> Hello, Opsawg.  The last round of comments on this draft have been
> discussed/resolved, and we'd like to kick off a three-week WG LC for
> this work.  Please provide any and all feedback on list before the end
> of the day May 13, 2022.
>
> Authors, if you have suggestions for a good shepherd for this document,
> we'd love to hear them.
>
> I have requested reviews from Ops and Routing on this work.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to