> On 2022-07-18, at 11:28, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> We are actually following this part from RFC8407: 
> 
>   o  […]  If a YANG module
>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^    
>      contains reference or "description" statements that refer to an
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>      I-D, then the I-D is included as an informative reference.
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Amazing.  A “get out of jail free” card.

I’ll use this loophole to avoid delaying my future drafts by normative 
references to I-Ds, even if the reference actually [1] is a normative 
requirement for implementing the standard.

(How could this pass the IESG?)

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to