Support this draft, with a few comments and suggestions below: 1. It will be more reasonable to place use section before protocol definition section.
2. Please add reference to RFC defining SRv6 Endpoint Behavior in both abstract and introduction section 3. Please add reference to RFC which allocate 89 Element ID to forwardingStatus; 4. Use case is not clear how these new IPFIX Information Elements work together with existing IPFIX Information Elements Or how these new IPFIX Information Elements work together with SRv6. -Qin 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Paolo Volpato 发送时间: 2022年8月22日 20:00 收件人: [email protected] 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh Hi, I have read the draft and think it is useful in the area of network operations. Therefore I support its adoption. BR Paolo From: OPSAWG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke) Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 10:14 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh Hello, WG. We’d like to begin a two week call for adoption of this work. Even as an individual draft it has already received some reviews and has iterated quite a bit. Based on IETF 114 there does seem to be interest in adopting this in opsawg, but we need a formal adoption poll. Please review and provide your adoption thoughts no later than September 1, 2022. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
