Ah, I follow you now, Tom. Yes, things have been quiet in LC, but otherwise this document has received a number of reviews and input prior to LC.
Still, it would be good to get some support to it being ready. I’d especially like Jürgen to weigh in if he’s around as his name is on the original MIB from RFC6353. I’ve also requested some further reviews from SEC and OPS DIRs. I myself have a small review I was sitting on, and I’ll send that out now. Joe From: tom petch <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 11:38 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: IETF 114 OPSAWG minutes From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Sent: 24 August 2022 14:06 Hey, Tom. We addressed this on slide 6 of the chairs slides. It may not have been captured in the minutes, but it was presented and should be heard in the recording. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/114/materials/slides-114-opsawg-chairs-slides-02 <tp> Ah yes, going to WGLC next! Which it did 11aug22. My curiosity was whether or not there was any comment, hum or anything else. I do not see anything on the mailing list with the WGLC expiring tomorrow. Mmmm Tom Petch Joe From: tom petch <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 07:23 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: IETF 114 OPSAWG minutes From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Sent: 11 August 2022 16:37 Hello, WG. The minutes from HedgeDoc have been imported to Datatracker. THANK YOU Rob Wilton for taking such good notes (and anyone else that pitched in). https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/114/materials/minutes-114-opsawg-01 There are a few action items that came out of the meeting. In particular: * WG LC on SNMP TLS work <tp> I see it not. I agree that you have kicked off the IPR check and WGLC but can find no mention of the I-D or any discussion thereof in the minutes. Tom Petch * CfA on draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh (this should progress fairly quickly to LC like the last extension document) * SAIN WG LC conclusion now that the YANG Doc comments have been addressed The WG LC has begun on the SNMP TLS work, and look for us to take care of the other two in short order. I’d also like to take this opportunity to thank Adrian Farrel for all his hard work as document shepherd on the LxNM and related work. We are always looking for people willing to be shepherds, and it is a good way to learn IETF process. Let the chairs know if you’re interested in upcoming shepherd work. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
