On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 04:17:12PM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote: > Using a standard format such as CBOR means that the initial cost to > implementations is large. But any further extensions are likely to be > trivial.
IMHO: The initial cost for greenfield implementation with CBOR should be smaller than for the bespoke format used now, unless there are good, free toolchains available for this legacy format. The initial cost for brownfield implementation to change from bespoke to CBOR might be higher. Toerless > Alan DeKok. > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
