tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > web should be https not http
There are lots of reasons why a self-hosted SBOM might have to be HTTP.
> On 02.09.22 18:57, [email protected] wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and
>> Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
>>
>> Title : Discovering and Retrieving Software Transparency and
>> Vulnerability Information Authors : Eliot Lear Scott Rose Filename :
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-07.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2022-09-02
>>
>> Abstract: To improve cybersecurity posture, automation is necessary to
>> locate what software is running on a device, whether that software has
>> known vulnerabilities, and what, if any recommendations suppliers may
>> have. This memo specifies a model to provide access to this
>> information. It may optionally be discovered through manufacturer
>> usage descriptions.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access/
>>
>> There is also an htmlized version available at:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-07
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-07
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at
>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list
>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>>
> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
