Thank for clarification, so Diameter protocol doesn't need to define any new attributes with similar functionality as Radius attributes, right?
-Qin -----้ฎไปถๅไปถ----- ๅไปถไบบ: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] ไปฃ่กจ Alan DeKok ๅ้ๆถ้ด: 2022ๅนด9ๆ15ๆฅ 21:42 ๆถไปถไบบ: Qin Wu <[email protected]> ๆ้: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>; [email protected] ไธป้ข: Re: [OPSAWG] ๐ CALL FOR ADOPTION: RADIUS Extensions for Encrypted DNS On Sep 15, 2022, at 9:39 AM, Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > Is relying on specific RADIUS attributes mandatory? Can we rely on other AAA > message, e.g., Diameter message protocol to populate DHCP messages, no? All RADIUS attributes can be carried inside of Diameter. This capability is part of Diameter, and does not need to be mentioned in any RADIUS specification. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
