The Encrypted-DNS-SvcParams TLV seems to be limited to 253 octets.  This is
a problem, since it is meant to hold a SvcParams object that is allowed to
be much larger (up to ~65000 octets in principle).

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:44 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Forgot to include radext and add…
>
>
>
> *From: *OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Joe Clarke
> (jclarke) <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 12:43
> *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *[OPSAWG] 🔔 WG LC: RADIUS Extensions for Encrypted DNS
>
> Hello, WG.  While this work was recently adopted, there was a considerable
> amount of discussion and work put in to address issues and stabilize the
> spec.  The authors feel it has reached a steady state and is ready for WG
> LC.  Based on my read of the discussion threads, it does appear the major
> issues have been addressed.
>
>
>
> Therefore, this serves as the start of a two week WG LC for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns/.
> Please provide your comments and/or support for the current spec on-list
> prior to October 27.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Joe
> --
> Add mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to