Hi Joe, Thatβs because network services are isolated/segregated by adequate addressing schemes. I donβt expect that to change and see DNS service offered by operators be muxed with other customler-facing services they offer.
Cheers, Med De : radext <[email protected]> De la part de Joe Abley EnvoyΓ© : jeudi 13 octobre 2022 15:03 Γ : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email protected]> Cc : Ben Schwartz <[email protected]>; Alan DeKok <[email protected]>; Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Objet : Re: [radext] [Add] [OPSAWG] π WG LC: RADIUS Extensions for Encrypted DNS Hi Mohamed, I may well have missed some nuance in the discussion that came before, but I found this comment interesting: On Oct 13, 2022, at 03:41, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: This specification targets typical broadband services in which the use of ECH is not relevant. It does not make sense for ISPs to be hosting multiple domains on the same IP address as the encrypted DNS resolver. Can you say why? If an operator has invested in infrasructure designed to be able to handle TLS and HTTP at high volumes with high availability, does it not seem possible that they would seek to reuse that general TLS/HTTP infrastructure for multiple purposes? If ECH is relevant in other services carried over HTTPS, why is it definitively not relevant for this one? Joe _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
