Dear Jean, Thanks a lot for the comprehensive review and comments. They all make perfectly sense.
I merged them into the -02 version https://raw.githubusercontent.com/graf3net/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/main/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-02.txt And here the diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01.txt&url2=https://github.com/graf3net/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/blob/main/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-02.txt Please let me know if I addressed all your points. I will submit -02 once the ongoing adoption call is finished and the document name changed. Best wishes Thomas From: Jean Quilbeuf <jean.quilb...@huawei.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 6:11 PM To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org>; opsawg@ietf.org Cc: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme...@ietf.org Subject: RE: WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01 Dear All, I support the adoption of this draft. I have a few very minor comments below. Best, Jean Section 1, paragraph 4: OLD "Since these IPFIX IEs are performance metrics [RFC8911], they must be registered as registered performance metrics [RFC8911] in the "IANA ..." NEW "Since these IPFIX IEs are performance metrics [RFC8911], they must be registered in the "IANA ..." Section 3.4.2 OLD "For each <statistic>, Singleton one of the following [..] applies " NEW "For each <statistic> Singleton, one of the following [..] applies " Section 3.4.2.3. (Max) I would add the scope of n from RFC6049 after the formula "where all packets n = 1 through N have finite singleton delays." Section 6.2.X "OctedDelta" is not defined, do you mean deltaCounter as in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7012#section-3.2.3 Section 7.2 Computing the average from PathDelaySumDeltaMicroseconds seems unecessary as PathDelayMeanDeltaMicroseconds already exports it. Maybe state that the advantage of pushing that computation to the collector is to avoid doing too much computation in the router? From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Thursday 22 December 2022 02:26 To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> Cc: draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-teleme...@ietf.org> Subject: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01 Hi WG, This mail starts a WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry%2F&data=05%7C01%7CThomas.Graf%40swisscom.com%7Caa99015a1e2c4866f54808daee76aa36%7C364e5b87c1c7420d9beec35d19b557a1%7C0%7C0%7C638084490672856810%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=v2E88K1AbhDgQXruPPmv6gWCI8cQ1lhaBkB2QFI2MqA%3D&reserved=0> Please reply your supports or objections. We would really appreciate your comments. Since there are holidays, this call will last for 3 weeks, and end on Thursday, Jan 12, 2023. Cheers, Tianran (as co-chairs)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
