Dear Med, Thanks a lot for your comment on the designated expert in the "IPFIX IPv6 SRH Segment Type Subregistry" and the removal of the intro section in the "IANA Considerations"
Here the -10 document: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/main/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-10.txt The diff from your last input: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/3dc1a87f423fe8aa8f61691df924b95971c38860/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-10.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/main/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-10.txt Best wishes Thomas From: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-HCS Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 7:48 AM To: 'Aitken, Paul' <pait...@ciena.com> Cc: ie-doct...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; rwil...@cisco.com Subject: RE: [Ie-doctors] [IANA #1271817] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh (ipfix) Dear Paul, Thank you very much. I merged all your input. PA> 5.4. srhActiveSegmentIPv6 / Additional Information, Changed from RFC8754 to RFC8402, is that correct? Please say which section of the RFC is relevant. TG> That is correct. The active section is specified in Section 2 of RFC 8402 and being obtained from the SRH based from the Segment List and Segment Left. I add the section in the RFC 8402 reference now as well. Thanks for spotting this. Here the -10 document: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/main/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-10.txt The diff from your last input: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/2669406f75d0ad66d830d9981c2d0c480dc88e2b/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-10.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/main/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-10.txt And the diff to -09: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/main/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-09.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/network-analytics/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/main/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-10.txt Best wishes Thomas From: Aitken, Paul <pait...@ciena.com<mailto:pait...@ciena.com>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 9:29 PM To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-HCS <thomas.g...@swisscom.com<mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com>> Cc: ie-doct...@ietf.org<mailto:ie-doct...@ietf.org>; opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>; drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org<mailto:drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org>; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>; rwil...@cisco.com<mailto:rwil...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [Ie-doctors] [IANA #1271817] expert review for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh (ipfix) Thomas, 3. srhSegmentIPv6BasicList "As specified in Section 2 of [RFC8754]" versus 5.5 / Description, "As described in Section 2 of [RFC8754]". 3. srhSegmentIPv6ListSection Remove "Exposes" for consistency with 5.6 / Description. 3. srhSegmentsIPv6Left "Segment List from the SRH" -> "Segment List in the SRH" for consistency with 5.7 / Description. 3. srhIPv6Section Remove "Exposes" for consistency with 5.8 / Description. 3. srhIPv6ActiveSegmentType and 5.9. / Description Remove the first "from" to avoid "from ... from": Name of the routing protocol or PCEP extension from where the active SRv6 segment has been learned from. 3. srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength The definition is inconsistent with 5.10 / Description. 5.4. srhActiveSegmentIPv6 / Additional Information Changed from RFC8754 to RFC8402, is that correct? Please say which section of the RFC is relevant. 5.7. srhSegmentsIPv6Left / Additional Information Please don't duplicate the Description; just list the information once. Thanks, P.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
