Dear Lars, Thanks a lot for the review and comment. I addressed them in -14 version.
Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-14 Best wishes Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 9:16 AM To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-...@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Subject: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-13: (with COMMENT) Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-11 CC @larseggert ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Grammar/style #### Section 3, paragraph 10 ``` s information [IANA-IPFIX] allow to provide answers to the following questio ^^^^^^^^^^ ``` Did you mean "providing"? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, "allow" + "to" takes an object, usually a pronoun. #### Section 5.1.10, paragraph 5 ``` as a list, without the need of post processing. However, this method require ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. #### Section 6.1, paragraph 6 ``` emented the following IEs as part of a a production implementation in the VRP ^^^ ``` Possible typo: you repeated a word. #### Section 6.2, paragraph 1 ``` ListSection decomposition as part of a a production implementation in the ope ^^^ ``` Possible typo: you repeated a word. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
