Absent implementation of the geofeed: attribute in a particular IRR
database
if so, it was intentional. perhaps s/IRR/Whois/?
JMC: Yep. I see what you’re saying now. I was reading as RIR. I think IRR is
fine, but perhaps it should be expanded like you do RIR earlier.
> My biggest gripe in the diff is that your “Implementation Status”
> section has normative language, which seemed odd to me.
that MAY is from 9092. but i take your point and downcased it.
JMC: Thanks. There are two MUSTs there, too around how to interpret ARIN data.
This may just be me, but I wasn’t expecting any other instruction of how to
interpret the data in a status section. But the more I read this bit on ARIN,
I’m torn. I definitely follow what you’re getting at here. Maybe I’ll reserve
more thoughts until your next rev.
Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
