On Jul 26, 2023, at 10:41 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote: > >> Some assigned types seem to be used for private use while these types >> fall now under a specification required range. I don't know if it is >> worth to have some consistency here and consider a range for future >> specification required type, e.g., 300-32767 that won't be mixed with >> the historic ones. > > We allocated a few chunks for private use years ago, and they could be in use > internally somewhere, so we don't want to change that. But, maybe we should > mark them as deprecated? "Deprecated" presumably means "if you want to use one of these points for internal experimental use, OK, but we strongly recommend you get an officially-assigned value". I'd add "and don't ever let your internal use leak out to the outside world", perhaps with a parenthetical note "(I'm looking at *you*, Apple, and your use of DLT_USER2 for PKTAP)". _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
