I vote ’yes’ for adoption. It is important work to standardize attachment circuits, and decouple the attachment circuits model from service models.
Thanks, Krzysztof > On 2023 -Oct-02, at 15:21, Joe Clarke (jclarke) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > At IETF 117, we asked the room if there was support to adopt the four > attachment circuits drafts. The room had support (of the 75 present, 18 > raised hands for adoption interest, 1 was opposed), but the list is where it > counts. > > While the drafts aren’t too terribly long, there are four of them, so we will > do a three week call for adoption. Please review and comment on-list on the > following indicating whether you support their adoption or not: > > draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac > draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit > draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit > draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue > > The authors and contributors have all signaled there is no known IPR covering > this work. > > The CfA will end on October 23. > > Thanks. > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
