Thank you for your review, Bo. OPSAWG appreciates it. Joe
From: Bo Wu via Datatracker <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 04:00 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-06 Reviewer: Bo Wu Review result: Has Nits Hi all, I have reviewed this document as Ops area reviewer. This document updates RFC 9092, adding new sections of Fetching Geofeed data and the implementation of Geofeed, and supplements and optimizes the original sections based on practices. The document is well written and almost ready with small nits as below. 1. Abbreviations Severl abbreviations in the newly added text is better to be expanded on the first use, including Certification Authority (CA), EE (end-entity), Certificate Revocation List (CRL) and Autonomous System (AS). 2. Content seems repetitive Section 3: Any particular inetnum: object SHOULD have, at most, one geofeed reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when it is implemented. If there is more than one, the geofeed: attribute SHOULD be used. Section 4: If an inetnum: object has both remarks: with geofeed data and also has a geofeed: attribute, the geofeed: attribute SHOULD be used and the remarks: ignored
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
