> On 16 Dec 2023, at 10:16, Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Personally, I don’t get the value of “inb-OAM” compared with “in-band OAM”.
> It’s not like it can be said faster (one additional syllable to say it) and
> it only saves four characters in typing.
> “oob-OAM” is also marginal. Same number of syllables to say (I don’t think
> anyone pronounces “oob” as a single syllable), and a little more saving in
> typing.
+ 1
Stewart
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
