On Dec 29, 2023, at 1:58 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > Are port numbers really that precious (particularly if we can allow for a >> 1024 port allocation) that we have to force Deep Packet Inspection on > systems that want to disallow non-TLS traffic, or at least, to identify it so > that mis-configured clients can be fixed?
Not really. If the authors believe that there is significant operational benefit to re-using the port, then the document should explain that in detail. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
