The last call period has ended for these documents, and we did receive a few reviews from various directorates. Despite no major issues, the comments do request revisions to the three drafts. We ask the authors to address the comments prior to pushing on to the IESG.
We are also grateful that Thomas Graf as stepped forward to act as shepherd for these three documents. Thomas, let the chairs know if you need any help on the shepherd write-ups. Thanks. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Date: Monday, December 18, 2023 at 14:22 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: WG LC: IPFIX documents We’d like to kick off a [rather extended] WG LC on the three IPFIX-related “fixes” documents we have in the hopper. We’ve already requested some directorate reviews for these, and the authors feel they have stabilized well. Please review: · https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh/ · https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix/ · https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes/ And comment as to whether or not you feel they are in the right shape to progress to the IESG. We will run this LC until Jan 8 given that the holidays means some people will not be around. Also note that an IPR poll was conducted prior to adoption and no known IPR has been disclosed. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
