Hi Rebecca, authors, OPSAWG, I think that this errata is valid for both 5.1 and 6.1. I also noted a similar bug for 5.3 for the user_msg_len field. I’ve updated the errata report to also cover this. My intent is verify this errata.
Authors, OPSAWG, please let me know if you have any opinion on this. Regards, Rob From: Rebecca VanRheenen <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 10 January 2024 at 17:34 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, RFC Editor <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 (7754) Hi Robert, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial, so we changed the Type to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/). Note: A similar issue appears in Section 5.1 (perhaps “user field” here should also read “rem_addr” field): The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the user field, in bytes. You may review the report at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7754 Information on how to verify errata reports can be found at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ Further information on errata can be found at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php Thank you. RFC Editor/rv > On Jan 10, 2024, at 4:36 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8907, > "The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) > Protocol". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7754 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Joao Fracarolli <[email protected]> > > Section: 6.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the port field, in bytes. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the rem_addr field, in bytes. > > Notes > ----- > Substitute "port field" with "rem_addr field" > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8907 (draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-18) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System > Plus (TACACS+) Protocol > Publication Date : September 2020 > Author(s) : T. Dahm, A. Ota, D.C. Medway Gash, D. Carrel, L. Grant > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Operations and Management Area Working Group > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
