Hi Tommy, 

Thank you for the review.

The encoding should allow to export the full 256 range, but it is likely that 
fewer bits will be needed. unsigned32/unsigned64 are provided as examples to 
illustrate the use of reduced encoding 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7011#section-6.2).

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Tommy Pauly via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> Envoyé : mardi 2 janvier 2024 18:08
> À : [email protected]
> Cc : [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Objet : Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-
> 03
> 
> Reviewer: Tommy Pauly
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> Thanks for writing a clear and succinct draft. I only found one
> issue of note, around the registration of the new udpOptions
> Information Element.
> 
> Section 4.1:
> The data type used for the "udpOptions" entry is just listed as
> "unsigned", and is described as being either an unsigned32 or an
> unsigned64. However, when I look at the registry at
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2Fipfix.xhtml&data=05%7C02%7C
> mohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7a23dc00f97a4cadeee208dc0bb5555f
> %7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638398120645105476%
> 7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBT
> iI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=P9pWAnW5VI1SzmRx4
> Q%2FB2wOa3rsve1uOdsRm%2BMNB4%2B0%3D&reserved=0, I don't see any
> entries that use this abstract "unsigned" type, and it is not
> listed as an option in the element data types. Is there a reason
> this shouldn't just be registered as an unsigned64? My
> understanding from
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Frfc%2Frfc7011%23section-
> 6.2&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7a23dc00f97a4
> cadeee208dc0bb5555f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C
> 638398120645105476%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC
> JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdat
> a=1FvKZv60OgONy5w%2BygO9sSnBN121J9yveL7Gkv15apI%3D&reserved=0 is
> that an unsigned64 can be automatically encoded as an unsigned32
> if the value is small enough, so the definition can just use
> unsigned64.
> 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to