Dear all,
See in-line.
On 1/17/2024 12:51 PM, Henk Birkholz wrote:
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-02.html
ending on Wednesday, January 31st.
As a reminder, this I-D describes an information model in support of
automated network mitigation on what and how to report about
unintentional packet discards/losses that can have an impact on
service level objectives. Implementation of the informational model,
which could manifest, e.g., via NETCONF/YANG, SNMP or IPFIX, is
out-of-scope.
I read the previous version, and even provided feedback to John.
This is interesting work and I like the way the information it's
structured.
However, I am asking myself: what is the value of information model
these days?
I mean: what is the value of an information model without a respective
data model, or a mapping to data model(s)?
Regards, Benoit
The chairs acknowledge feedback to and interest for the topic during
the IETF118 meeting and on the list after afterwards. We would like to
gather feedback from the WG if there is interest to further contribute
and review.
Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments
you may have.
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
