I agree!

I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document.

The draft defines the concepts, requirements, and architecture of incident
management and a YANG data model for incident lifecycle management, which
can improve troubleshooting efficiency, ensures network service quality.


Ziyang Xing
-------------------------------------
Dear OPSAWG members,

this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-feng-opsawg-incident-management-04.html

ending on Thursday, February 22nd.

As a reminder, this I-D specifies a YANG Module for Incident Management.
Incidents in this context are scoped to unexpected yet quantifiable adverse
effects detected in a network service. The majority of the document
provides background and motivation for the structure of the YANG Module
that is in support of reporting, diagnosing, and mitigating the detected
adverse effects.

The chairs acknowledge some positive feedback on the list and a positive
poll result at IETF118. We would like to gather feedback from the WG if
there is interest to further contribute and review.

Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments you
may have.


For the OPSAWG co-chairs,

Henk

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to