Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote:
> The data we are talking about scales to number of devices X number of
> MUD-URL changes. This can further be reduced by whether or not the MUD
> file actually exists. These are not large #s in the home, and in the
> enterprise, we have iron for such cases.
Also, if you have 1000 instances of device-type X, then one could put all the
potential MUD-URLs into a single table, and then reference them from the
device X definition. That is, 3rd normal form it, and do data deduplication.
Such a table also can keep one from retrieving the same MUD file (and
signature) 1000 times.
If you really had a problem with the number of URLs stored, which I don't
think anyone will really have.
I don't think we need to keep track of malicious URLs that we ignored.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
