John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this document. Paul Wouters DISCUSS rings true for me. I do have one small comment. Probably this is just an editing mistake left over from some earlier revision. The last para of the Intro is: ``` The Security Considerations section covers some of the negative outcomes should MUD/firewall managers and IoT manufacturers choose not to cooperate. ``` It doesn't, though. I guess either fix the SecCons to do what the Intro says, or change the Intro to accurately describe the SecCons. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
