Title: Response to your Liaison Statement - LS on the consent of draft Recommendation ITU-T Q.3962 (ex. Q.joint_tr) "Requirements and Reference Model for optimized traceroute of joint Internet Protocol/Multi-Protocol Label Switching" Submission Date: 2024-03-15 URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1902/
From: Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> To: Tatiana Kurakova <tatiana.kurak...@itu.int>,Study Group 11 <tsbs...@itu.int>,Denis Andreev <denis.andr...@itu.int> Cc: Multiprotocol Label Switching Discussion List <m...@ietf.org>,Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group Chairs <mpls-cha...@ietf.org>,Routing Area Directors <rtg-...@ietf.org>,Operations and Management Area Working Group Discussion List <opsawg@ietf.org>,Operations and Management Area Working Group Chairs <opsawg-cha...@ietf.org>,Operations and Management Area Directors <ops-...@ietf.org>,Scott Mansfield <scott.mansfi...@ericsson.com>,itu-t-liai...@iab.org <itu-t-liai...@iab.org> Response Contacts: m...@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org Technical Contacts: Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> Purpose: For information Referenced liaison: LS on the consent of draft Recommendation ITU-T Q.3962 (ex. Q.joint_tr) “Requirements and Reference Model for optimized traceroute of joint Internet Protocol/Multi-Protocol Label Switching” (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/) Body: Thank you for your Liaison Statement - LS on the consent of draft Recommendation ITU-T Q.3962 (ex. Q.joint_tr) "Requirements and Reference Model for optimized traceroute of joint Internet Protocol/Multi-Protocol Label Switching" dated 2023-10-24. This has been passed on to the MPLS working group by the OPSAWG for consideration. The MPLS working group would like to thank you for sharing your requirements as expressed in Q.3962. Our current understanding of your requirements suggests that all or most of your requirements can be addressed using existing IP/MPLS OAM tools, and that no further protocol work is necessary. We would welcome all experts to bring these requirements to the IETF's MPLS working group with a view to working collaboratively on an Informational RFC that describes how to deliver the function you want to see. Obviously, should any gaps be discovered during this process, the working group would also be pleased to engage in additional protocol work to resolve any issues using the procedures described in RFC 4775 and RFC 4929. Kind regards, Adrian Farrel, MPLS Working Group Co-Chair (On behalf of the MPLS Working Group and Co-Chairs) Joe Clarke, OPSAWG Co-Chair (On behalf of the OPSAWG and Co-Chairs) Attachments: No document has been attached _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
