[email protected] wrote:
    > For example, Michael indicated that he wished he had a better name for
    > "Virtual In-Band OAM" (I still don’t digest what does that mean
    > actually). I also indicated that I wished I had terms for the following
    > when I edited RFC 9451:

The fact that you don't know what it means from the term means that we got
something wrong in the name in my opinion :-)

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to