Thanks for the quick responses and push on this draft. And thank you, Med for stepping up to shepherd. FYI, we have asked for a review from TSVART at Med’s request to see what the appetite is for a dedicated port allocation.
Joe From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 09:55 To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: John Heasley <[email protected]>, Andrej Ota <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Confirm submission of I-D draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 Dear OPSAWG, Mohamed, This attest revision intends to address the majority of the issues raised in the last round of review (Thanks to Med) There is one known outstanding issue at this time, to update the TLS Identification with reference to RFC 9525. We plan to include that, and revisions related to this draft version, shortly. Many thanks. The Authors. From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 23 April 2024 at 14:46 To: Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]>, Andrej Ota <[email protected]>, John Heasley <[email protected]>, Thorsten Dahm <[email protected]> Subject: Confirm submission of I-D draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 Hi, The IETF datatracker Internet-Draft submission service has received your Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13-07, and requires a confirmation step in order to be able to complete the posting of the Internet-Draft. Please follow this link to the page where you can confirm the posting: https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/142126/confirm/9c5e13a4722a901ff95632148619611b/ Best regards, The IETF Secretariat through the Internet-Draft submission service
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
