We would like to thank the WG (and TEAS) for the reviews and comments during WG LC. LC has concluded, and comments have been addressed (today) for issues raised.
We are still pending a couple of shepherd write-ups, but once we get them we can move these drafts forward to the IESG. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Date: Friday, April 19, 2024 at 10:40 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: WG LC: Attachment circuits work Thanks to efforts by the WG and cross-collaboration with TEAS, these four drafts are at the point to run a WG LC. All currently reported issues have been resolved by the authors, and we are grateful to have four volunteers for shepherds. The Attachment Circuits work is divided into four documents: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/ Given the size of the work, we will run for a three-week LC period (closing on May 10), and we are copying teas@ for additional reviews. Please reply on-list with comments. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
