We would like to thank the WG (and TEAS) for the reviews and comments during WG 
LC.  LC has concluded, and comments have been addressed (today) for issues 
raised.

We are still pending a couple of shepherd write-ups, but once we get them we 
can move these drafts forward to the IESG.

Joe

From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com>
Date: Friday, April 19, 2024 at 10:40
To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Discussion List 
<t...@ietf.org>
Subject: WG LC: Attachment circuits work
Thanks to efforts by the WG and cross-collaboration with TEAS, these four 
drafts are at the point to run a WG LC.  All currently reported issues have 
been resolved by the authors, and we are grateful to have four volunteers for 
shepherds.

The Attachment Circuits work is divided into four documents:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/

Given the size of the work, we will run for a three-week LC period (closing on 
May 10), and we are copying teas@ for additional reviews.  Please reply on-list 
with comments.

Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to