Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for addressing Paul’s and Roman’s comments. I will wait for > Roman to confirm whether the changes you have made, mostly deleting the > paragraphs that he put a DISCUSS on, whether he is ok with removing his > DISCUSS on the document.
Fantastic.
Probably have to poke him directly to get an answer.
> At the same time, looking at the number of diffs between -13 and the
> latest version of the draft, including a completely new section on
> “Interactions with mDNS and DNSSD”, another WG LC, albeit shorter (1
> week), would be in order.
Works for me.
> Cheers.
>> On Jun 19, 2024, at 2:48 PM, Michael Richardson
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi, I posted a -15 document that I hope addresses Roman's DISCUSS.
>> Paul has changed his Abstain to a No Objection a few weeks ago.
>>
>> As Mahesh (the OPSAWG AD) returned the document to the WG in early
>> April, my understanding, however, is that the WG may need to do
>> another WGLC on it. Perhaps Mahesh will decide to skip that or not.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting
>> ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Alternatives:
> ----------------------------------------------------
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
