Dear OPSAWG members,
this email concludes the call for Working Group Adoption for
draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-01.
Despite the general vacation time around several place on the globe, we
received some positive feedback and no objections.
Taking into account the previous list discussion and the brevity of the
I-D as well its scope of application, the chairs discussed the inputs
and comments and believe this I-D to be ready for adoption and for the
working group to work on.
Authors please rename the draft to be
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00, keeping the content as is, and
resubmit.
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
On 26.06.24 11:58, Henk Birkholz wrote:
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-01
ending on Saturday, July 6th. That is a little bit of an odd duration,
but the I-D is crisp and concise and if there is rough consensus after
that time, this work may become a WG item before the upcoming cut-off.
As a reminder, this I-D specifies IPFIX Information Elements for the
Alternate-Marking Method as defined in RFC9341 & RFC9342; a technique
for measuring packet loss, delay, and jitter of packets in-flight.
The chairs acknowledge positive feedback and some review on the list and
we would like to gather feedback from the WG if there is interest to
further contribute and review.
Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments
you may have.
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
