[Adding NMOP chairs] Or even NMOP, if we are not sure if it is a language (YANG) issue. NMOP is tasked to look at all operator issues, including any scale issues.
Cheers. > On Jul 7, 2024, at 5:19 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, Xueyan. I cannot view the PPT in this liaison, but the context around > it seems like netmod might be more suited to this work and your presentation. > I see you’ve also included netmod and Netconf in the liaison audience, so > perhaps you agree that there is expertise there. > > Alternatively to proposing this to netmod, I am copying the Ops area > directors. Many people that attend netmod also come to the opsawg meeting > since it also includes the Ops Area portion. Perhaps they would want to > incorporate this into their section. Still, my first instinct would be to > discuss this in netmod. > > Joe > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, July 7, 2024 at 00:09 > To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > <[email protected]> > Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: REQUEST FOR PRESENTATIONS: Opsawg 120 session > > Dear Chairs, > I would like to request a time slot during IETF 120 meeting to present the > liaison sent from Broadband Forum on Management at Scale Projects. > Liaison name: Follow up on Management at Scale Projects > Liaison presenter: Xueyan Song and Deepak Rajaram > Xueyan will introduce the liaison text. Deepak will present the attached > slides of the liaison. > Liaison link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1935/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1935/> > Slot requested: 15min > > > The presentation intends to introdue the issues facing the telecom industry > with regards to scale go beyond the management of ONUs extending across the > entire Access Network, and some general concepts analyzed by Broadband Forum > that are designed to alleviate them. It would be very beneficial to get > IETF's participants feedback and suggestions on what is the better next step > to take for BBF or its members towards IETF to get an IETF solution for the > scalability issue identified. > An IETF response liaison to BBF with suggested way forward would be very much > appreciated. > > > > Best regards, > Xueyan Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
