On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:42 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> Re-, > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[email protected]> > > Envoyé : jeudi 11 juillet 2024 12:11 > > À : The IESG <[email protected]> > > Cc : [email protected]; opsawg- > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Objet : Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg- > > udp-ipfix-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > > > > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-13: Discuss > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to > > all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free > > to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCUSS: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Tommy Pauly > > for the TSVART > > review. > > > > I would like to discuss something that might not be completely > > technical but we > > should understand that aspect better. The sub-sections of section > > 4 defines > > udpXOptions and "reference" itself. > > [Med] Yes, because this is the reference of the document that > specifies/request the registration. > > My understanding is that it > > should > > reference to the draft where UDP options are defined. > > [Med] That's referenced in the Additional information. > > I won't provide the long story here that motivated the note but the short > one is the note in the registry: > > "The columns previously titled "References" and "Requester" have been > renamed "Additional Information" and "Reference", respectively." > OK, great. Thanks for this information. > > My > > understading can be > > wrong, but this is what is done for tcpOptions in RFC5102. So, I > > would like to > > discuss if we are referencing to the correct document or not. > > [Med] I confirm the current registration is correct. > > > > > Another discussion - as this specification is based on > > draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options, that draft already defines number > > of Kind values > > for SAFE and UNSAFE options then why we are not defining IEs for > > them? > > > > [Med] Not sure to get your point. We do have IEs that can exports kinds > for both SAFE and UNSAFE. We used to have these in one single IEn but > abandoned that design because it was suboptimal for an encoding compactness > perspective. I see, then it was not that clear that we are abandoned that desing in favour of encoding effiency. I think it would need some backgoround and rational on that to clarify the design choice. I will clear my discuss and move the last point to the comment section so that we can provide some clarification. Thanks for your promt reply, Med. //Zahed > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
