Hi Joe,

I do agree that it makes sense to keep this work in OPSAWG. But since you 
mention it, I am sure this liaison statement is being shared with the DMM WG to 
get their input on whether they would like any addition to the statement.

Thanks.

Mahesh Jethanandani
[email protected]

> On Dec 20, 2024, at 2:56 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Before sending this on to the 3GPP liaison, Benoît and I would like to get 
> feedback from opsawg on this LS.  For now, we’re focusing this on the work 
> happening in opsawg (though we are aware of other dmm work).  If there is 
> additional proposed text WG members feel strongly can be added to tie that 
> work together (maybe with the collaboration of dmm chairs), we would be open 
> to it.
>  
> The intent of this LS is to draw broader review to this work.
>  
> Joe
>  
>  
> <The IETF Operations and Management Area Working Group.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to