Hi Erik, > On Apr 16, 2025, at 3:45 AM, Erik Kline via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-opsawg-04-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-opsawg/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > # Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-opsawg-04-04 > CC @ekline > > * comment syntax: > - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md > > ## Comments > > * "Develop such work items that are not in the scope of an existing WG" > > -> > > "Develop such work items that are not in the scope of an existing OPS > area WG"? > > It doesn't seem right to declare OPSAWG to be a catch-all for any work > from anywhere within the IETF. I feel the existing text leaves open > that interpretation, though.
Fair enough. Will accept your edit. Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
